gratis-postfach?

Die aktuelle c’t 15/2003 hat als Aufmacher unter anderem einen Artikel, der mit „happy@gratis-postfach.de“ übertitelt ist. Dabei geht es um Freemailer und ihr Angebot. Kleine Perle am Rande: Man rate mal, was passiert, wenn man gratis-postfach.de aufruft… Jetzt muss ich nur noch schauen, ob unter happy@gratis-postfach.de auch jemand antwortet *gg*

Hier das Resultat… Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:42 +0200
Received: from [193.99.145.36] (helo=caipirinha.heise.de)
by mxng15.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19dumD-0006Fb-00
for eD@edings.de; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:41 +0200
Received: from mail by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dumD-00041B-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:41 +0200
X-Failed-Recipients: happy@gratis-postfach.de
From: Mail Delivery System
To: eD@edings.de
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id:
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:41 +0200

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software (Exim).

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

happy@gratis-postfach.de
Too many „Received“ headers – suspected mail loop

—— This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ——

Return-path:
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dumC-000415-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:40 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd7w6vTf; Sat Jul 19 18:41:31 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dum2-00040t-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:30 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdTUy3Lg; Sat Jul 19 18:41:21 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19duls-00040h-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:20 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdhmpmCi; Sat Jul 19 18:41:11 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19duli-00040W-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:10 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd7xMyMm; Sat Jul 19 18:41:01 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dulY-00040D-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:41:00 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdrQdEqg; Sat Jul 19 18:40:51 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dulO-0003zy-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:50 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdOt9Gyo; Sat Jul 19 18:40:41 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dulE-0003zm-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:40 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdam0IYc; Sat Jul 19 18:40:31 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dul4-0003ze-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:30 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd0emABf; Sat Jul 19 18:40:21 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19duku-0003zR-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:20 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd40Q0Jg; Sat Jul 19 18:40:10 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dukk-0003zI-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:10 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd7UYLli; Sat Jul 19 18:40:01 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19duka-0003z1-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:40:00 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdyTWp7d; Sat Jul 19 18:39:51 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dukQ-0003yn-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:50 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpduq7dvb; Sat Jul 19 18:39:41 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dukG-0003yb-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:40 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdz6cXWi; Sat Jul 19 18:39:30 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19duk6-0003yN-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:30 +0200
Received: from relay.heise.de(193.99.145.50), claiming to be
„caipirinha.heise.de“
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpd18Bl6g; Sat Jul 19 18:39:21 2003
Received: from uucp by caipirinha.heise.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19dujw-0003xy-00
for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:20 +0200
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de(212.227.126.183)
via SMTP by relay.heise.de, id smtpdzVLSXO; Sat Jul 19 18:39:20 2003
Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19dujw-0008MX-00
for happy@gratis-postfach.de; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:20 +0200
Received: from [62.224.213.184] (helo=altair.local)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 19dujw-0001Y9-00
for happy@gratis-postfach.de; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:20 +0200
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 18:39:22 +0200
…

Hmmmm … schade. Kuriose Mail-Konfiguration. Dabei wäre das doch wirklich witzig: Wer hat seine Mailadresse schon zigtausendfach auf einem c’t-Titel stehen???